In September 2005, Elizabeth, a jewelry designer and full-time mom,
noticed a lump in her breast and thought it was probably a fibroid.
When she went for a routine mammogram that month, Elizabeth told the
technicians about the lump, but it did not appear on the films. A
sonogram showed the lump as a solid mass. Elizabeth immediately
underwent a biopsy, which revealed a 1.9-centimeter tumor.
Fortunately, the
tumor was lymph node-negative (N-) and estrogen receptor-positive
(ER+), which meant it was contained — all positive for Elizabeth's
prognosis.
She underwent a
lumpectomy, followed by radiation treatment. Her tumor was close to the
breastbone, so to be safe, her surgeon removed 23 lymph nodes along
with the tumor.
Next, Elizabeth
began to search for an oncologist, visiting two oncologists who had
come highly recommended. Given her status as pre-menopausal, and the
size of her ER+, N- tumor, both of them recommended chemotherapy
followed by hormonal therapy — the standard treatment for this type of
cancer.
“This was
heartbreaking to me, to be hit with this at 40 years old with two young
boys. I still wanted a third child,” said Elizabeth, now 42.
Elizabeth's mother
had been diagnosed with non-invasive breast cancer at age 64, and was
treated with a lumpectomy and radiation. Elizabeth had hoped that her
treatment would be similar. After her diagnosis, Elizabeth researched
doctors, treatment and support systems to find what would work for her.
“It was like a full-time job,” she said.
One morning, Elizabeth's brother called to tell her about Oncotype
DX®,
which he'd seen on TV. Elizabeth asked her surgeon about the test, and
he determined that she was a candidate for the test and ordered it for
her. None of the oncologists she had been to had told her about the
test. “I found out about it from my brother, an investment manager at
Morgan Stanley — not the medical professionals I'd spent so much time
seeking out,” she said.
Elizabeth's Recurrence Score®
result was 16, indicating that her recurrence risk was in a lower
range. Elizabeth made an appointment with an oncologist at a cancer
center in New York, to discuss her result. After the previous
oncologists' recommendations of chemotherapy and hormone therapy,
Elizabeth was surprised to hear her new oncologist say that she didn't
think chemotherapy was necessary, and was confident treating her with
hormone therapy alone. Elizabeth's Recurrence Score suggested that
chemotherapy would provide minimal benefit.
Today, Elizabeth
has completed radiation therapy and is continuing hormonal therapy. She
is confident in her decision not to undergo chemotherapy, based on her
Recurrence Score results. “What a great thing to be differentiated
within this class of women with breast cancer,” she said. “Not all
cancers are the same, so why treat everyone the same way with something
so toxic? It's so remarkable that finally, you can distinguish one
person's cancer from another — I'm just so thankful.”